In a world increasingly focused on green energy and climate targets, conservatives have a unique opportunity to champion nuclear power as a solution to energy independence and environmental responsibility. Often misunderstood, nuclear energy is a clean, efficient, and reliable source that aligns with conservative values of innovation, stewardship, and self-reliance. Organizations like the American Conservation Coalition (ACC) exemplify this alignment. Founded in 2017 by young conservatives, ACC mobilizes youth around environmental action through common-sense, pro-innovation, and limited-government principles. They have been vocal proponents of nuclear energy, recognizing it as an essential component of a clean energy future that balances economic growth and environmental responsibility. With the help of groups like ACC, conservatives can demonstrate that energy security and environmental stewardship are not at odds but are, in fact, complementary goals.
Few things are as critical to a nation’s security as its ability to produce its own energy. Reliance on foreign oil has, for decades, tied the hands of American policymakers, forcing uncomfortable compromises (and conflicts, one may argue) with unstable regimes. The recent energy crises in Europe, exacerbated by dependence on Russian natural gas, highlight the risks of energy vulnerability. Nations that cannot supply their own energy are at the mercy of geopolitical forces beyond their control, a position that is both precarious and avoidable.
Nuclear power offers a path to true energy independence. With abundant uranium reserves, advanced reactor technology, and the capacity to generate immense power with minimal land use, the United States could lead a nuclear renaissance. Unlike wind and solar, which depend on weather conditions and require vast land areas (among other negatives), nuclear reactors provide consistent, scalable energy output, making them a reliable backbone for the grid. By reducing dependence on imported energy sources and intermittent renewables, nuclear power ensures that America remains self-sufficient, secure, and prosperous.
This pursuit of energy independence aligns seamlessly with conservative values of national sovereignty and self-reliance. A nation that controls its own energy production is freer to set its own course without being beholden to hostile powers. For conservatives who prioritize America’s autonomy and security, nuclear power is the logical choice.
At the same time, nuclear power represents an opportunity for conservatives to reclaim the environmental debate. While environmentalism has largely been co-opted by the left, true conservation has always been a deeply conservative principle. Stewardship—the responsible management of resources entrusted to us—is at the heart of nuclear energy. Unlike coal or natural gas, nuclear power produces no greenhouse gas emissions during operation. In fact, nuclear energy already prevents the emission of over 470 million metric tons of carbon dioxide annually in the United States, equivalent to taking nearly 100 million cars off the road, according to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). This achievement should be celebrated as a testament to human ingenuity and our ability to balance progress with responsibility.
Furthermore, nuclear power’s environmental footprint is far smaller than that of renewables like wind and solar. A single nuclear plant can produce the same amount of energy as thousands of acres of solar panels or hundreds of wind turbines, all while preserving natural landscapes and wildlife habitats. This efficiency should appeal to conservatives who value protecting America’s scenic beauty and rural character. Covering vast tracts of land with solar farms and wind turbines is not conservation; it is a misguided attempt to solve one problem while creating others. Nuclear power, by contrast, uses resources wisely and leaves minimal impact on the environment.
Economic arguments for nuclear power are equally compelling. For years, the left has dominated the conversation around energy subsidies, pouring billions into renewables like wind and solar with limited returns on reliability and scalability. These industries remain heavily dependent on government handouts, raising questions about their long-term viability. Nuclear energy, by contrast, is a proven technology with decades of successful operation. Modern advancements in small modular reactors (SMRs) promise even greater efficiency and safety while reducing upfront costs. Unlike experimental green technologies, nuclear power is not a gamble—it is a sure bet.
Investing in nuclear energy also creates high-paying, long-term jobs. Unlike temporary construction roles associated with renewables, nuclear plants require skilled workers—engineers, technicians, and operators—who contribute to local economies for decades. These are the kinds of stable, meaningful jobs that conservatives champion, jobs that support families and strengthen communities. Revitalizing America’s nuclear industry would not only secure our energy future but also restore the industrial base that has been eroded by decades of outsourcing and neglect.
Despite its many advantages, nuclear power continues to face opposition rooted in fear and misinformation. High-profile disasters like Chernobyl and Fukushima have left an indelible mark on the public imagination, leading many to question the safety of nuclear energy. However, these incidents involved outdated technology or poor oversight, conditions that no longer apply to modern reactors. Today’s nuclear plants are designed with multiple fail-safes and rigorous safety standards, making them one of the safest energy sources available. Studies consistently show that nuclear energy has caused fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal, oil, or even renewables like hydropower.
Critics also point to the issue of nuclear waste, often framing it as an insurmountable problem. However, this too is a myth. Advances in waste recycling and secure storage methods have made managing nuclear byproducts far more feasible than opponents suggest. Additionally, the volume of waste produced by nuclear power is minimal compared to the environmental and human costs of fossil fuels. For conservatives who value pragmatic solutions over alarmist rhetoric, these facts should be more than enough to dispel any doubts about nuclear energy’s viability.
Some opponents, like actress Jane Fonda, argue that nuclear plants take too long to build—claiming it takes 10 to 20 years—making them impractical for addressing immediate energy needs. She recently made this claim on Bill Maher’s Club Random podcast. However, this perspective overlooks significant advancements in nuclear technology and project management. Modern SMRs are designed for faster construction and deployment, often within a few years. Countries like China and the United Arab Emirates have demonstrated that with streamlined regulations and political will, nuclear plants can be built in a timely and cost-effective manner. Moreover, the longevity and reliability of nuclear plants mean that the initial investment of time pays off in decades of stable, clean energy production. Fonda’s critique fails to acknowledge that the short-term focus on renewables has left many nations with unreliable energy grids, a problem nuclear power could solve for the long haul.
For too long, nuclear energy has been misunderstood, maligned, and grievously underutilized. Conservatives have an opportunity to change this narrative and reclaim nuclear power as a cornerstone of America’s energy policy. Organizations like the American Conservation Coalition are already proving that conservatives can lead the charge for innovative and sustainable solutions, offering a vision of environmental responsibility that doesn’t compromise on economic growth or individual freedom. By championing nuclear energy, we can demonstrate that stewardship and progress are not only compatible but essential to our shared future.
Nuclear power is not just the conservative answer to energy security—it is the answer for all Americans. It is a solution rooted in common sense, guided by science, and driven by the spirit of innovation that has always defined this nation. Now is the time for us to embrace it.
Michael J. Hout is the Editor of Liberty Affair. He currently resides in Warsaw, Poland. Follow him on X: @michaeljhout
Leave a Reply Cancel Reply